Go Back   فیض رضا - FaizeRaza > Rad e Badmazhab > Rad e Badmazhab > Rad e Shia


Some Details: Posted by شیرمحمد on 12-26-2009 (11:56 PM), last reply was on 12-29-2009 (12:16 AM). This thread has received 1 replies and been viewed 218 times.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2009, 11:56 PM   #1
شیرمحمد
کارکن
 
شیرمحمد's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 558
Thanks: 61
Thanked 1,221 Times in 325 Posts
Default Refutation of the Rawafidh [Shī'ah]

Refutation of the Rawafidh [Shī'ah]



Rafidhies (SHI'AH) Exposed!

O Allah! Guide us upon the right path and You are sufficient for us. And save us from dissension and all other such calamities. May Allah Ta’ala send Benediction and Salutation upon our Leader, Master, Refuge, Asylum, the Last and the Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa (Sall Allahu Alaihi wa Sallam), his offspring, companions and whole Ummah. Ameen!

It is thoroughly, well investigated and researched matter, that these abuser Rafidhis, who are insolent of either, of the Shaikhain, for example, Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique and Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anhuma) or anyone of them. Though, not to the extent, that they do not admit them rightful Imams and Caliphs. They are absolutely and surely Kaffirs. According to and in the light of the clarifications of all the most authentic books of Hanafi Jurisprudence; and by all the other Ulama and the Imams, who have clearly written in their books, when they were asked in this regard. The most famous book of the Islamic Fiqh (Law) book “Durr al-Mukhtar”, has mentioned that:

"If a person who says that Allah Ta’ala has a body like any other creature, will be Kaffir, without any doubt. So, anyone who denies the companionship of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh) will also be declared as a Kaffir."

(Ref: Durr-al-Mukhtar, Published from Matba Mujtabai Dehli, Page 83)

And there is unanimity, consensus and agreement of the whole Muslim Ummah upon this issue.

In another famous book of the Islamic Fiqh “Tahtavi”, Hashiyyah (a commentary) on “Durr”, has also clearly and definitely mentioned that: “And similarly, those who deny Caliphate of any of the four rightly guided caliphs, are also Kaffir.”

(Ref: Tahtavi, Published from Misr [Egypt], Vol 1, Page 244)

It is also written in the renowned Islamic Fiqh books that: “Any Rafidhi who claims that Hazrat Mawla Ali (Karam Allahu wajh al-Karim) is superior to all companions, is a heretic, and a wrongdoer. And if, he denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh) he is then no doubt, a Kaffir.”

(Ref: Fatawa Khulasa, in ‘Kitab al-Salat’ (chapter of Salah) section: 15, and “Khazanat al-Musannafeen”, in the chapter of ‘Kitab al-Salat’ (Book of Salah) in the section ‘To follow a Rafidhi in Salat, is it right or wrong’?)

In another famous and renowned Islamic Fiqh books, it is stated that: “Any Rafidhi, who prefers Mawla Ali above the other three rightly guided Caliphs, is a misled. If he denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique and Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anhuma) he is then, a Kaffir.”

(Ref: “Fateh al-Qadeer”, Sharah (a commentary) on the most renowned and reliable Fiqh book “Hedaya”, printed in Egypt, vol.1, page. 248. And in Hashiyyah (a commentary) on the Fiqh book “Tabi’een al-Salamah”, by Allama Ahmad as-Salabi, printed in Egypt, vol. 1, page. 135)

Another Islamic Fiqh book has stated too, that: “Anyone, who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr (Radi Allahu Anh) is a Kaffir; and this is absolutely true. And, if anyone, who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anh) is also a Kaffir. This is also absolutely true.”

(Ref: Al-Wajeez, by Imam Kurdari, printed in Egypt, vol. 3, page. 318)

Another most renowned and reliable Islamic Fiqh book “Tabi’een al-Haqaique”, Sharah (a commentary) on another most reliable Fiqh book “Kanz al-Daqaique”, has mentioned that: “Imam Marghinani has said, that Salah will be invalid, if it is performed by following a Rafidhi.”

(Ref: “Tabi’een al-Haqaique”, Sharah (a commentary) on another most reliable Fiqh book “Kanz al-Daqaique”, printed in Egypt, vol., page.134)

It is written in the most reliable and renowned Islamic Fiqh book “Fatawa Alamgiri”, and it has also mentioned, that: “Likewise, it is stated in the following two Islamic Fiqh books “Tabi’een al-Haqaique”, and “ Fatawa Khulasa” and that is the truth.”

(Ref: Fatawa Alamgiri, printed in Egypt, vol. 1, Page. 84)

It is also written in the following Fiqh books “Bada’eh”, “Bazaziyyah”, “Asabah”, “Fan al-Sa’ani”, “al-Haf al-Abrar wal-Basair”, “Fatawa Qurwiyyah” and “Waqiat al-Muftiyyin”, and all these books have quoted references from another most authentic and renowned Fiqh book “Fatawa Khulasa”, that: “Rafidhi Tabarai, who reproach and abuse Hazrat Shaikhain, for example, Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique and Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anhuma) are Kaffir. And if, they only prefer Hazrat Mawla Ali (Karam Allahu wajh al-Karim) they will not be Kaffir, but they will be misled and heretic.”

(Ref: ‘Bada’eh.”, vol. 3, page. 264, and “Bazaziyyah”, vol. 3, page. 319, “Asabah”, “Fan al-Sa’ani”, ‘Kitab al-Sair’, “al-Haf al-Abrar wal-Basair”, printed in Egypt page. 187, “Fatawa Qurwiyyah”, printed in Egypt, vol. 1, page. 25, and “Waqiat al-Muftiyyin”, printed in Egypt, page. 13)

And it is written in “Barjindi”, Sharah (a commentary) on another Fiqh book “Naqayyah”, Both of these books have quoted references from “Fatawa Zaheeriyyah”, that: “Anyone, who denies Imamat (Caliphate) of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique, is no doubt, a Kaffir. And such a person is also irreligious.” Then both of them commented that: “What the great Imam has said is right; and it is true that such a person is a Kaffir without any doubt. Similarly, anyone, who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anh) is also a Kaffir, according to the right, true and absolute statements.”

(Ref: “Barjindi”, Sharah (a commentary) on another Fiqh book “Naqayyah”, vol. 4, page. 21)

It is also mentioned in another most renowned Fiqh book “Fatawa Bazaziyyah”, that: “This is one of the obligations to belief that the Rafidhis, the Nasibis and the Kharjis, are all Kaffir. Because, they say Amir al-Momineen, Hazrat Othman, Hazrat Mawla Ali, Hazrat Talha, Hazrat Zubair and Hazrat Ayisha Siddiqua (Radi Allahu Anhum) were Kaffirs.”

(Ref: Fatawa Bazaziyyah, Noori Books Store Peshwar, Vol 6, Page 318)

Another most renowned, famous and most authentic Islamic Fiqh book “Bahr al-Raique”, has stated that: “The most correct and authentic belief is that: ‘Anyone, who denies the leadership and Caliphate of either, Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique or Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anhuma) is no doubt, a Kaffir.'"

(Ref: Bahr al-Raique, printed in Egypt, vol. 5, page. 131, Bahr al-Raique, Babal Ahkaamal Murtadeen, Published by H.M. Saeed Co. Karachi, Vol 5, Page 121)

It is mentioned in another authentic and most renowned Fiqh book “Majma al-Anhar”, Sharah (a commentary) on the book “Multaqi al-Abhar”, that: “If the Rafidhis are only Tafdhili (those Shias, who prefer Hazrat Mawla Ali (Radi Allahu Anh) above the other three Sunni Caliphs) then, they are misled. If, they deny the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr (Radi Allah Anh) then, they are no doubt, Kaffirs."

(Ref: “Majma al-Anhar”, Sharah (a commentary) on the book “Multaqi al-Abhar”, printed in Istanbul, vol. 1, page. 105)

This book mentions again, that: “Any person who denies companionship of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique is, no doubt, a Kaffir. Likewise, he who denies Hazrat Abu Bakr’s (Radi Allahu Anh) right to the Caliphate is also a Kaffir. This is according to true Madhab (Faith). Similarly, denial of the companionship of Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anh) is also Kufr. This is according to the right, true and authentic statements of the great Ulama and the Imams.”

(Ref: “Majma al-Anhar”, Sharah (a commentary) on the book “Multaqi al-Abhar”, printed in Istanbul, vol. 1, page. 631)

It is mentioned in the most reliable and renowned Fiqh book “Ghuniyyah”, Sharah (a commentary) on the book “Muniyyah”, has mentioned that: “Irreligious, means that anyone, whose faith is against the Faith of the Ahlus-Sunnat wa-Jama’at, in any matter. To follow such a person in Salah is not lawful at all, with any consideration. And the condition is that, when belief of such a person does reach to the extents and to the limits of Kufr. This is in the light of the religious teaching; and according to the belief of the Ahlus-Sunnat wal Jama’at. If, his belief takes him to reach the extent and the limit of Kufr, then to follow such a person in Salah, will not be lawful by any means. Some of their great Kufr (disbelieves) are, for example, the extremist Rafidhis say, that: 'Mawla Ali (Karam Allahu wajh al-Karim) is the ‘god.’ And they also proclaim: 'The Prophet Hood was assigned for Hazrat Mawla Ali (Radi Allahu Anh) and, the Angel Jibril mistakenly delivered it to the wrong person by the instruction of Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh).' There are so many example of their Kufr, such as these, which we have just mentioned above, which leads them out of the bounds of Islam. Any Salah, which has been performed by following such person, who equates to Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh) such a lie, he has abused and slandered Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh) that he was not a trustworthy person, must be performed again. Also, avoid performing Salah behind anyone, who denies the companionship, or Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique, or Abuses him, or Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anhuma)."

(Ref: “Ghuniyyah”, Sharah (a commentary) on the book “Muniyyah”, printed in Istanbul, page. 514, Gunyatul Mustamila, Faslil oola Bil Imamah, Suhail Academy Lahore, Page 515)

The most acknowledged Islamic Fiqh book “Kifaya”, Sharah of another Authentic Fiqh book “Hedaya”, and “Mustakhlis al-Haqaique”, Sharah of another Fiqh book “Kanz al-Daqaique”, and, these both have stated, that: “If the irreligiousness of such a person reaches to the extent of the Kufr, as did the irreligiousness of the Jahimiyyah’s and the Qidriyyah’s, who say that the Quran is a creation of Allah Ta’ala, and not the true Words from Him. The extremist Rafidhis, deny the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh). Then, how can that Salah be right, which is performed following them?”

(Ref: “Kifaya”, Sharah of another Authentic Fiqh book “Hedaya”, printed in Bombay, India, vol. 1, and “Mustakhlis al-Haqaique”, Sharah of another Fiqh book “Kanz al-Daqaique”, Bab Fee Bayanal Ahkaam Al-Imamah, Printed in Kanshi Raam Bros. Lahore, Page 515)

The famous Fiqh book “Sharah Kanz” and in another Fiqh book “Hashiyyah Fateh al-Mo’een”, have both stated that: “There is stated in “Fatawa Khulasa”, that: ‘Any Salah, which has been performed by the following of an irreligious person becomes invalid, such as, Jahimiyyah, Jabriyyah, Qidriyyah, Rafidhiyyah, or any other such person, who believe that the Holy Quran is a created being, or any other sect, who believe in such ugly faith, like them.’ The reasons are, that the Salah will only be rightly performed, if it is performed by the following of those people of the Qibla, who are not extremist, misled and whose irreligiousness has not reached to the extent, which does not lead him to the bounds of Kufr. But, the extremist Rafidhis, deny the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh)."

(Ref: Sharah Kanz, by Mulla Miskin, printed in Egypt, vol. 1, page. 208, Hashiyyah Fateh al-Mo’een)

Another Fiqh book “Tahtavi Ala Miraqi al-Falah”, has stated that: “Anyone, who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh) is, no doubt, a Kaffir. And this is also stated in another Fiqh book “Fateh al-Qadeer”, that: “There is no doubt, that anyone, who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anh) is, also a Kaffir. And to perform Salah by following such a person is not lawful. The following will not be lawful of that person too, who denies brushing up (mas’ah) on the leather-socks, or he denies the companionship of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh). And, he also abuses or slanders the Shaikhain (Radi Allahu Anhuma), Umm al-Momineen Hazrat Ayisha Siddiqua (Radi Allahu Anha). The Salah will not be valid, which is performed by following any such a person, who denies any of the essentials of Deen. And, so, he will be also Kaffir, and none of his interpretations will be regarded, or taken into account.”

(Ref: Tahtavi Ala Miraqi al-Falah, printed in Egypt, page. 198)

The most versified Fiqh book “Nazm al Faraid”, it is stated that: “He who abuses Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anhuma) or reproaches them, is no doubt, a Kaffir. And he, who says that ‘Yadullah’ (Hand of Allah) and takes it’s meaning literally, is also a disbeliever. No doubt, this is the greatest of disbeliefs. And, anyone who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh) will be charged with the infidelity. Anyone, who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anh) will also be charged with the infidelity.”

(Ref: Nazm al Faraid by Allama Ibn Wahban, printed in Egypt, Page 40)

The most famous and authentic Fiqh book has said that: “If the Rafidhis reproach the Shaikhain (Radi Allahu Anhuma) or abuse them, they will become Kaffir. But, if they just say, that Mawla Ali (Karam Allahu wajh al-Karim) is superior to both of them. Then, there is no doubt, they are not Kaffir, but they will be regarded as wrongdoers, misled and irreligious.” and The same book which has been mentioned above, it has mentioned again that: “One who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radi Allahu Anh) is no doubt, a Kaffir. This is according to the right and true Madhab. And the same is the verdict for one, who denies the Caliphate of Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anh). This is according to the genuine evidence and true statements.”

(Ref: “Taisir al-Maqasad”, Sharah of another Fiqh book “Wahabaniyyah”, by Allama Shrumbulali, and, he in ‘Kitab al-Siyar')

There is written in the Fatawa of the Shaikh al-Islam, Ubaidullah Afandi, in his books “Mughni al-Mustafti an Sawal al-Mufti”, and “Uqood al-Dariyyah”, that: “Rafidhis are Kaffirs, because of their many contradictory and wrong disbeliefs and Kufrs. And one of their ugly beliefs is, that: ‘Total denial of the Caliphate of the Shaikhain.’ Those who reproach the Shaikhain are also Kaffirs. May Allah Ta’ala dishonor them, and anyone who contributed in anyone of their affairs in those matters, is also a Kaffir.” The same books has mentioned, that: “To reproach Shaikhain (Radi Allahu Anhuma) is such a great matter, such as, to be insolent of the Holy Prophet (Sall Allahu Alaihi wa Sallam) himself. Imam Sadar Shaheed said, that: ‘He who reproaches anyone of the Shaikhain, is no doubt, a Kaffir.’”

(Ref: Uqoodal Dariyyah, Bab Arraddah wa Ta'zeez, Irag Bazar Qandhar Afghanistan, Vol 1, Page 103-104)

The book “Uqood al-Dariyyah”, has stated after mentioning of the above Fatwa, that: “The Ulama in Sultanate of Uthmaniyyah Turkiyyah (Othman of Turkey) were in agreement of the Fatwa against Rafidhis by the Divine Help of Allah Ta’ala. The most learned amongst them became Shaikh al-Islam, and they gave unanimously the verdicts against the Shias (Rafidhis) abundantly. Many amongst them wrote lengthy books against the Rafidhis; and many other amongst them also wrote small books and pamphlets. They all charged the Rafidhis with infidelity and apostasy. They were all in agreement and have unanimously given the verdict against the Rafidhis.”

(Ref: Uqoodal Dariyyah, Bab Arraddah wa Ta'zeez, Irag Bazar Qandhar Afghanistan, Vol 1, Page 104)

Allama Kawakabi Jali has stated from the passage from the great scholar, and the commentator of the Holy Quran, Abu Saud Afandi Imadi, and the leader of the Mufti of the Sultanate (Kingdom) of Uthmaniyyah, in Sharah (a commentary) on a well known and verified Fiqh book “Ba-Fawaid as-Sunniyyah”

In the book “Asabah” and “Waqiyyat al-Ma’een". They have quoted references from another verified and renowned Fiqh book “Manaqib Kardari”, which has stated, that: “He who denies the Caliphate of Shaikhain or hates them, there is no doubt, such a person, is a Kaffir. Because, both are the beloved of the Holy Messenger (Sall Allahu Alaihi wa Sallam). Many who were the most learned amongst them have clarified and clearly stated that: “Rafidhis Tabarai, are such Kaffirs that their repentance will never be accepted.”

(Ref: “Asabah”, in the chapter ‘Rawayat’, and, the book “Ithaf”, “Anqarwi”, vol.1, page. 25, and “Waqiyyat al-Ma’een, printed in Idara-e-Ma'arif Islamia Baluchistan, page. 13)

In other renowned Fiqh books, it is stated: “The repentance of every apostate will be acceptable, but the repentance of those who became Kaffirs, because of their insult and blasphemy of any Prophet, or Shaikhain, or any of the Sahabah, is not acceptable.”

(Ref: Tanveer al- Absar, on the original text of the authentic and most reliable Fiqh book “Durr al-Mukhtar”, printed in Hashmi press, page. 319, Durral Mukhtar, Kitabul Jihad, Babal Murtad, Printed in Mujtabai Dehli, Vol 1, 57-356)

It is also written in another most renowned Fiqh books that: “The repentance of any Kaffir, who repents, is accepted in the World; and the hereafter. But, there are some Kaffirs, that their repentance will never be accepted. And amongst them are those who became Kaffirs, because of their insult and blasphemy against our Holy Prophet (Sall Allahu Alaihi wa Sallam) or against any other Prophet (Alaihimus Salam). There are also those who became Kaffir, because they insulted Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique or Hazrat Umar Farooque (Radi Allahu Anhuma).”

(Ref: Asabah wan-Nazair, Fatawa Khairiyyah, Kitaabul Sayyar, Babal Murtad, printed in Darul Ma'arifa Egypt, vol. 1, pages. 94, 95, 102, Ittihafal Absaar wal Basaair, Printed in Egypt, Page 186)

It is stated in the most authentic Fiqh book “Durr al-Mukhtar”, that: “It is stated in the book “Bahr al-Raique”, and it has quoted references from other Fiqh books, such as: “Jawaharah Nayarah”, Sharah “Mukhtasir Qudoori”, by Imam Sadar Shaheed, that: ‘Any person who reproaches the Shaikhain (Radi Allahu Anhuma) or taunts them, is no doubt, a Kaffir, and his repentance will never be accepted.’”

(Ref: Durral Mukhtar Sharah Tanveeral Absaar, Babal Murtad, Printed in Mujabai Dehli, Vol 1, 357)

And this is also the verdict of Imam Daboosi and Imam Faqih Abu al-Lais Samarqandi. This is the right and true statement, and judgement to issue the verdict against them. And in another Fiqh book “Asabah”, has also stated the similar event and accepted this verdict. Shaikh al-Islam, Hazrat Allama Muhammad bin Abdullah Abu Abdullah Ghazi, Jannartash, has too, accepted this verdict.

It is stated in other authentic books which have clearly mentioned that: “It is Wajib (incumbent) to charge, that Rafidhis are Kaffir, because of their belief in infidelity. And there is no doubt that they are out of Islam. The religious command against them will exactly be the same, which are against the apostates.” It is also stated in “Fatawa “Zaheeriyyah".

(Ref: “Fatawa Hindiyyah” vol. 2, page. 1246, “Tariqa al-Muhammadiyyah”, and its commentary “Hadiqa an-Nadiyyah”, printed in Egypt, vol. 1, page. 207, 208, “Barjindi”, Sharah “Naqayyah”, vol. 4, page. 20)

The Fiqh book “Khazanat al-Mufteen”, has stated, that: “Though, they do not deny other essentials of Deen, except for the reproach and denying of the Caliphate of Shaikhain (Radi Allahu Anhuma). According to the statements of the distinguished Imams, who were also Mutakallameen (those Imams, who describe or define details of the Faith), that: “They are misled like the dogs of Hell.”

(Ref: Khazanat al-Mufteen, Kitabul Faraiz, Vol 2, Page 250)

And, all Rafidhis in the present age are not only Tabarai, but generally, they all deny essentials of Deen. Undoubtedly and definitely, they are infidels and apostate by the consensus and agreement of all the Muslim Imams of the past and present. The Ulama have clarified that those who do not admit them as Kaffir, are themselves Kaffirs. Despite of their many other Kufrs, all their Ulama, ignorant and knowledgeable men, women, minors and majors, are involved in two obvious Kufrs.



BEWARE:

Muslims! Essentials of Deen are its origin and foundation. And essentials do not need any proof on account of their own obviousness and axiomatic, that is their own proof. But, if there is any absolute injunction, still the same command will be applied, that the denier is surely a Kaffir. For example, the clarification of ‘The Universe with its all parts is a created being’ would not be found in any absolute injunction in the Holy Quran and Shariah. But this has been stated in the Holy Quran that the Heaven and Earth are created. But, according to the consensus and agreement of the Muslim Ummah, he who believes eternity in any other thing than Allah Ta’ala, is absolutely a Kaffir. By the Grace of Allah Ta’ala, we have gathered together abundant testimonies and have mentioned them in our book “Maqam al-Hadeed ala Khaddil Mantiq al-Hadeed”, that: “These are the reasons, and to have faith in the creation of Allah Ta’ala, is amongst the essentials of Deen, and this does not need any special proof."

The book “A’alam”, by Imam Ibn Hajar has stated on page. 17, that: “This is the reason, that no interpretation or anyone’s false and assumed supposition will be heard from anyone."

This is an absolute command based on the consensus and agreement about the Tabarai Rawafidh, that:

They are generally infidels and apostates. The animals slaughtered by them are carrion. To marry with their men and women is absolutely unlawful (Haram) rather it is pure adultery. May Allah Ta’ala forbid! If this marriage is between a Rafidhi man and a Muslim woman, then this is a great Divine wrath. If the man is Sunni, and woman Rawafzi, then this is from among the greatest evils. This marriage will not be lawful, but mere adultery. And any child born from this marriage will be illegitimate. He would not get inheritance from his father, even though the child will be Sunni. There is no father of an illegitimate child. The woman will not have the right for legacy or dowry. This is because there is no dowry for adulteress. The Rafidhis cannot inherit from the legacy of any near relation, or inherit from the legacy of his father, mother, son and daughter. Sunni is, but a Sunni, a Rafidhi cannot inherit from the legacy of any Muslim or any Kaffir, nor has he any right from the legacy of people of his own religion, Rafidhi. Familiarizing with them, and keeping any relationship with them, or greeting them, or speaking with their men, women, Alim and Illiterate is, a great sin, and severely unlawful (Haram). One who is aware of their abuses and blasphemous beliefs, and still consider them Muslim, or has doubt in their Kufr. Such a person is himself an infidel and misled, according to the consensus and agreement of the Imams, the Awliya and the Ulama. All those verdicts will also be applied against him, which have been mentioned for the Rafidhis. This is an obligation for the Muslims that they must heed this verdict attentively and become true and pure Sunni Muslims by acting upon it.
شیرمحمد is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2009, 12:16 AM   #2
طلب گار دعا
رکن
 
طلب گار دعا's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 3,982
Thanked 4,061 Times in 888 Posts

Awards Showcase
3000 پیغامات 2000 پیغامات 1000 پیغامات 500 پیغامات 
Total Awards: 4

Default

ماشاء اللہ جزاک اللہ خیر
__________________
امتحا ن کے کہا ں قا بل ہوں میں پیا رے ا للہ
بے سبب بخش دے مولا تیرا کیا جا تا ہے
دعا گو و طلب گاردعا
طلب گار دعا is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
rawafidh, refutation, shīah

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +5. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Copyright © 1997 - 2010 by NooreMadinah Network http://www.NooreMadinah.net http://www.RazaEMustafa.net http://www.NaatRang.net